ENTITY RISK SCORE · PILLAR 4 OF 4
Status Trend Risk.
5% of total score
The early-warning component
Considers the entity's review history, workflow status, and trend of case outcomes over time — explicitly mapped signals from source surveillance systems.
KEY METRICS WE TRACK
MNC COMMAND CENTER SYSTEMS ARE EXCLUDED FROM SCORING
AGING
How long alerts remain in each workflow stage.
THROUGHPUT
How many alerts are completed over time.
REWORK RATE
Alerts reopened or returned for additional work.
ESCALATION RATE
Percentage of alerts escalated for further review.
INACTIVITY
Alerts with no action in a defined time window.
RESOLUTION QUALITY
Confirmed outcomes and evidence sufficiency.
WORKLOAD PRESSURE
Volume relative to team capacity and SLA targets.
SCORING MODEL
Workflow / Status Trend Score
68
(0–100)
Weighting
5%
baseline default
Contribution to Entity Risk Score
3.40
points
Higher scores indicate greater operational risk. Illustrative synthetic example.
EXAMPLE: ENTITY TRD-7712 — WORKFLOW OVERVIEW (LAST 30 DAYS)
Open Alerts
247
↑ 18% vs prior 30 days
Overdue Alerts
46
↑ 22% vs prior 30 days
Avg. Age (Days)
6.4
↑ 1.8 vs prior 30 days
Escalation Rate
14.2%
↑ 2.6 pp vs prior 30 days
Rework Rate
11.3%
↑ 1.9 pp vs prior 30 days
Inactivity > 7 Days
31
↑ 29% vs prior 30 days
ALERTS BY WORKFLOW STAGE
AGING OF OPEN ALERTS (DAYS)
What this means: aging and rework are increasing, and escalations are elevated. Focus on clearing backlog and reducing delays in the In Review and Pending Info stages.
TREND OVER TIME
Workflow / Status Trend Score (0–100)
68↑ 8 vs prior 30 days
HOW IT FEEDS THE COMPOSITE
50%
Alert Derived Risk
30%
Behavioral Pattern Risk
15%
Related Entity Risk
Configurable
Status Trend Risk
This pillar · MNC baseline default 5%
Sibling weights shown are MNC baseline defaults — every weight is customer-configurable in the Calibration Lab. The composite runs 0–100 with governed bands — a risk indicator and review priority, never a determination.